Robert Reich's latest book is "THE SYSTEM: Who Rigged It, How To Fix It." He is Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley and Senior Fellow at the Blum Center. He served as Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration, for which Time Magazine named him one of the 10 most effective cabinet secretaries of the twentieth century. He has written 17 other books, including the best sellers "Aftershock,""The Work of Nations," "Beyond Outrage," and "The Common Good." He is a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine, founder of Inequality Media, a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and co-creator of the award-winning documentaries "Inequality For All," streamng on YouTube, and "Saving Capitalism," now streaming on Netflix.

+  MY LINKTREE    +  SUPPORT INEQUALITY MEDIA
+  FOLLOW ON TUMBLR    +  TWITTER    +  FACEBOOK

PBS, JANUARY 13, 2020

UCTV, DECEMBER 22, 2017

CNN, DECEMBER 13, 2017

TRAVIS SMILEY, NOVEMBER 30, 2017

MORNING JOE, NOVEMBER 9, 2017

ABC, APRIL 30, 2017

ABC, FEBRUARY 26, 2017

CNN, FEBRUARY 21, 2017

CNN, FEBRUARY 2, 2017

CNN, DECEMBER 10, 2016

CNN, DECEMBER 7, 2016

CNN, DECEMBER 7, 2016

DEMOCRACY NOW!, AUGUST, 2016

C-SPAN BOOK TV, OCTOBER, 2015

COLBERT REPORT, NOVEMBER, 2013

WITH BILL MOYERS, SEPT. 2013

DAILY SHOW, SEPTEMBER 2013, PART 1

DAILY SHOW, SEPTEMBER 2013, PART 2

DEMOCRACY NOW, SEPTEMBER 2013

INTELLIGENCE SQUARED DEBATES, SEPTEMBER 2012

DAILY SHOW, APRIL 2012, PART 1

DAILY SHOW, APRIL 2012, PART 2

COLBERT REPORT, OCTOBER, 2010

WITH CONAN OBRIEN, JANUARY, 2010

DAILY SHOW, OCTOBER 2008

DAILY SHOW, APRIL 2005

DAILY SHOW, JUNE 2004

TRUTH AS A COMMON GOOD, APRIL, 2017

MUNK DEBATE ON THE US ELECTION, OCTOBER, 2016

WHY WORRY ABOUT INEQUALITY, APRIL, 2014

LAST LECTURE, APRIL, 2014

INEQUALITY FOR ALL, NOVEMBER, 2013

THE RICH ARE TAXED ENOUGH, OCTOBER, 2012

AFTERSHOCK, SEPTEMBER, 2011

THE NEXT ECONOMY AND AMERICA'S FUTURE, MARCH, 2011

HOW UNEQUAL CAN AMERICA GET?, JANUARY, 2008

  • Democrats Should Stop Battling Over Health-Insurance Mandates


    Thursday, December 13, 2007

    The major Democratic candidates, along with some left-leaning pundits, are battling over whether to require people to buy health care. That’s unfortunate because mandates are the least important and least popular parts of their plans.

    The current Democratic consensus on health care is striking. In fact, given the myriad ways universal health insurance might otherwise be organized – single payer, employer mandate, vouchers, tax credits – it’s astonishing. All of the major health insurance proposals require employers either to provide coverage to employees or contribute to the cost of coverage; create purchasing pools that will offer insurance to anyone who doesn’t get it from an employer; preserve freedom of choice of doctor; cover children; and aim to save money through more preventive care, better management of chronic disease, and standardized information technology. And all subsidize lower-income families with revenues coming from letting the Bush tax cuts expire.

    Mandates are a sideshow. All their plans would cover a large majority of those who currently lack insurance. A big chunk of the remainder are undocumented immigrants, who aren’t covered by any of the plans. So mandates are relevant to only around 3 percent of the population.

    Hillary Clinton thinks this 3 percent is mostly young and healthy and should be required to buy insurance in order to bring costs down for everyone who isn’t. Obama thinks they’re mostly people who won’t be able to afford even subsidized premiums, so they’d just ignore any mandate. As a practical matter, the difference comes down to timing and sequencing. Clinton wants to start with a mandate. Obama says if it turns out most of this remaining 3 percent are young and healthy, he’ll go along with a mandate, too.

    It’s only to be expected that gloves will come off in the last months of a primary campaign. But by warring over mandates, Democrats are leading with their chins. It’s the least important aspect of what they’re offering. It’s also, to many Americans, the least attractive because it conjures up a big government bullying people into doing what they’d rather not do.

    The public is ready for universal health insuranc, but to get it enacted after January, 2009, Democrats need to start building a movement in support of the big and important reforms universal health insurance requires – on which they happen to agree.

    Share


  • Click for Videos