Robert Reich's latest book is "THE SYSTEM: Who Rigged It, How To Fix It." He is Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley and Senior Fellow at the Blum Center. He served as Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration, for which Time Magazine named him one of the 10 most effective cabinet secretaries of the twentieth century. He has written 17 other books, including the best sellers "Aftershock,""The Work of Nations," "Beyond Outrage," and "The Common Good." He is a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine, founder of Inequality Media, a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and co-creator of the award-winning documentaries "Inequality For All," streamng on YouTube, and "Saving Capitalism," now streaming on Netflix.

+  MY LINKTREE    +  SUPPORT INEQUALITY MEDIA
+  FOLLOW ON TUMBLR    +  TWITTER    +  FACEBOOK

PBS, JANUARY 13, 2020

UCTV, DECEMBER 22, 2017

CNN, DECEMBER 13, 2017

TRAVIS SMILEY, NOVEMBER 30, 2017

MORNING JOE, NOVEMBER 9, 2017

ABC, APRIL 30, 2017

ABC, FEBRUARY 26, 2017

CNN, FEBRUARY 21, 2017

CNN, FEBRUARY 2, 2017

CNN, DECEMBER 10, 2016

CNN, DECEMBER 7, 2016

CNN, DECEMBER 7, 2016

DEMOCRACY NOW!, AUGUST, 2016

C-SPAN BOOK TV, OCTOBER, 2015

COLBERT REPORT, NOVEMBER, 2013

WITH BILL MOYERS, SEPT. 2013

DAILY SHOW, SEPTEMBER 2013, PART 1

DAILY SHOW, SEPTEMBER 2013, PART 2

DEMOCRACY NOW, SEPTEMBER 2013

INTELLIGENCE SQUARED DEBATES, SEPTEMBER 2012

DAILY SHOW, APRIL 2012, PART 1

DAILY SHOW, APRIL 2012, PART 2

COLBERT REPORT, OCTOBER, 2010

WITH CONAN OBRIEN, JANUARY, 2010

DAILY SHOW, OCTOBER 2008

DAILY SHOW, APRIL 2005

DAILY SHOW, JUNE 2004

TRUTH AS A COMMON GOOD, APRIL, 2017

MUNK DEBATE ON THE US ELECTION, OCTOBER, 2016

WHY WORRY ABOUT INEQUALITY, APRIL, 2014

LAST LECTURE, APRIL, 2014

INEQUALITY FOR ALL, NOVEMBER, 2013

THE RICH ARE TAXED ENOUGH, OCTOBER, 2012

AFTERSHOCK, SEPTEMBER, 2011

THE NEXT ECONOMY AND AMERICA'S FUTURE, MARCH, 2011

HOW UNEQUAL CAN AMERICA GET?, JANUARY, 2008

  • The Middle Does Pay A Larger Share, Contrary to Mankiw


    Sunday, July 15, 2007

    Claims, like mine, that middle-income workers are now paying a larger share of their incomes than people at or near the top “don’t hold up under close examination,” says Gregory Mankiw in today’s New York Times. (Mankiw was an adviser to President Bush and is now advising Mitt Romney in his campaign.) Mankiw relies on a study by the Congressional Budget office that finds the top 1 percent paying 31 percent of their income in federal taxes while the middle fifth pay 13.9 percent.

    But Mankiw ignores three very important things.

    First, although he acknowledges the existence of people like Warren Buffet, the second-richest man in America, who by his own admission pays only 17.7 percent of his income in taxes, Mankiw attributes this to the fact that Buffet’s earnings are made up largely of dividends and capital gains, which are taxed at 15 percent. But isn’t this also true for a large portion of the very wealthy? Mankiw asserts that “many other” top earner pay the maximim ordinary income tax rate of 35 percent. Some may, yet there’s reason to doubt that they comprise anywhere near a majority. Indeed, the financial pages of late have been filled with the doings of private-equity fund managers (who comprise a not insignificant portion of the top one-tenth of one percent) whose incomes continue to be treated as capital gains and taxed at 15 percent.

    Secondly, by Mankiw’s own admission, the CBO analysis assumes that corporate taxes are borne entirely by shareholders – 9.3 percentage points of 31.1 percent tax rate allegedly paid by the very rich are assumed to come from taxes that corporations pay on their behalf. But as anyone who has studied the corporate income tax knows, shareholders don’t bear all of it. Some is passed along to consumers in the form of higher prices and some to employees in the form of wages lower than otherwise.

    Finally, Mankiw fails to figure in state and local taxes, notably sales taxes and so-called “sin” taxes on cigarettes and alcohol, both of which eat up a far higher percentage of the incomes of middle-class and poor families than those of the wealthy.

    On close examination, then, it seems likely that middle-income workers do in fact pay a larger share of their incomes in taxes than do people at the top.

    Share
  • 2 notes from other Tumblr users


    Click for Videos